Showing Charles IX around age eleven, wearing the Ordre de Saint-Michel, this portrait is derived from a drawing of the king by François Clouet in the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Paris.
?William Alleyne, 3rd Marquess of Exeter, Burghley House, near Stamford, Northamptonshire (until d. 1888; his estate sale, Christie's, London, June 9, 1888, no. 282, as "Charles IX" by Janet, for £27.6.0); ?Edward Charles Baring, 1st Lord Revelstoke, London (until 1893; his sale, Christie's, London, June 3, 1893, no. 55, for £16.5.6); Château de Nijenrode, Breukelen, Netherlands (until 1923; château sale, Muller, Amsterdam, July 10, 1923, no. 1, as by François Clouet, for fl. 10,000); [J. Goudstikker, Amsterdam, from 1923; cat., 1923, no. 21]; [Goldschmidt Galleries, until 1925; sold to Kleinberger]; [Kleinberger, New York, 1925; sold for $7,100 to Friedsam]; Michael Friedsam, New York (1925–d. 1931)
New York. F. Kleinberger Galleries. "Loan Exhibition of French Primitives and Objects of Art," October 17–November 12, 1927, no. 50 (lent by Michael Friedsam).
Ottawa. National Gallery of Canada. "A Pageant of Canada," October 27, 1967–January 19, 1968, no. 17.
Louis Réau. "Une collection de primitifs français en Amérique." Gazette des beaux-arts, 5th ser., 13 (January 1926), pp. 10–12, ill.
Louis Réau inCatalogue of a Loan Exhibition of French Primitives. Exh. cat., New York. New York, 1927, p. 124, no. 50, ill.
Louis Réau in The Michael Friedsam Collection. [completed 1928], pp. 155–56, calls it a Portrait of Charles IX by François Clouet and notes that Charles wears the collar of the order of Saint Michael; observes that the portrait reproduces exactly the type of the Vienna Museum's [Kunsthistorisches Museum] great Charles IX, of which the Louvre, Paris, has a reduced version; states [erroneously] that the model for these portraits is a drawing in the Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg.
Bryson Burroughs and Harry B. Wehle. "The Michael Friedsam Collection: Paintings." Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 27, section 2 (November 1932), p. 13, no. 8, ill. p. 12, comment that "whether by François Clouet or not, this portrait must occupy an honorable place in the group of paintings ascribed to him"; note that the drawing on which it is based (Cabinet des Estampes, Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris) is dated 1561, when Charles was eleven years old, the first year of his reign.
Katharine Grant Sterne. "The French Primitives in the Friedsam Collection." Parnassus 4 (January 1932), p. 9, ill. p. 7, attributes it to François Clouet and calls it a free variant of the portrait in Vienna.
Charles Sterling. The Metropolitan Museum of Art: A Catalogue of French Paintings. Vol. 1, XV–XVIII Centuries. Cambridge, Mass., 1955, pp. 57–58, ill. p. 56, attributes it to a follower of François Clouet from the second half of the 16th century and calls it one of four contemporary portraits derived from Clouet's drawing of Charles IX in Paris and his painting of him in Vienna, both dated 1561; observes that our replica more closely follows the drawing in its half-length composition and in the form of the chain, and concludes that it was probably based on it rather than the Vienna painting.
Katalog der Gemäldegalerie. Vol. 2, Vlamen, Holländer, Deutsche, Franzosen. Vienna, 1963, p. 31, lists our portrait and one in the Pinacoteca, Brescia [Pinacoteca Tosio-Martinengo], "among other repetitions" of Franços Clouet's half-length portrait of Charles in Vienna (no. 94).
Nancy H. Yeide et al. The AAM Guide to Provenance Research. Washington, 2001, pp. 51–52, 54, ill.
Everett Fahy inThe Wrightsman Pictures. Ed. Everett Fahy. New York, 2005, p. 20, fig. 2, under no. 5.
Alexandra Zvereva. Portraits dessinés de la cour des Valois: Les Clouet de Catherine de Médicis. Paris, 2011, p. 365, under no. 395.
This is one of four contemporary portraits derived from François Clouet's drawing of Charles IX in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, and a painting in the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, both of which bear the date 1561. In the Vienna portrait the king wears a chain set with jewels and only his head and shoulders appear, whereas the Museum portrait, which is nearly half-length, shows him wearing the Order of Saint Michael on a simple gold chain. Our portrait corresponds more closely to the drawing and was probably directly based on it.