With its extreme contrasts of candlelight and shadow, pared-down geometry, and meditative mood, this painting exemplifies La Tour’s painting at its most accomplished and characteristic. These visual qualities were a powerful countertrend to Baroque painting’s typical pomp and showiness. A native of the duchy of Lorraine in eastern present-day France, La Tour was indebted to Caravaggesque painting, but tended toward even more simplified forms. The quiet atmosphere of this painting perfectly fits the subject, Mary Magdalen, who renounced the pleasures of the flesh for a life of penance and contemplation. She is shown with a mirror, symbol of vanity; a skull, emblem of mortality; and a candle that probably references her spiritual enlightenment.
This image cannot be enlarged, viewed at full screen, or downloaded.
Open Access
As part of the Met's Open Access policy, you can freely copy, modify and distribute this image, even for commercial purposes.
API
Public domain data for this object can also be accessed using the Met's Open Access API.
Use your arrow keys to navigate the tabs below, and your tab key to choose an item
Title:The Penitent Magdalen
Artist:Georges de La Tour (French, Vic-sur-Seille 1593–1652 Lunéville)
Date:ca. 1640
Medium:Oil on canvas
Dimensions:52 1/2 x 40 1/4 in. (133.4 x 102.2 cm)
Classification:Paintings
Credit Line:Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Charles Wrightsman, 1978
Object Number:1978.517
This painting, also known as the Magdalen with Two Flames, is one of several versions of the subject by La Tour. Others include the Repentant Magdalen (National Gallery of Art, Washington); the Magdalen with a Lamp (Musée du Louvre, Paris); and the Magdalen with the Smoking Flame (Los Angeles County Museum of Art). A fifth composition, the Magdalen Reading, was sold at auction in 1981 (Maître Claude Aguttes, Clermont-Ferrand, September 26, 1981; sold again, Hôtel des Ventes de Neuilly, Neuilly-sur-Seine, June 23, 1998), but doubts exist as to whether it is a copy or a poorly preserved original.
It was characteristic of La Tour’s creative process to concentrate on a theme and make different renderings of it, often portraying the same subject with significant alterations in design and mood. The four autograph Magdalens are of similar dimensions, all represent the saint as a seated, full-length figure, and all include a skull and lighted candle or lamp, yet they show different aspects of her reformed life. The Met's painting shows the moment of conversion and Mary Magdalen's renunciation of the worldly life. Its effect depends upon subtle contrasts between the shadows on the wall and the lit profile, the skull and the jewelry scattered on the table and on the floor, and the flame and its reflection in the silver mirror. A subsequent moment is seen in the closely related Paris and Los Angeles canvases, where she is depicted with a still life of sacred books, a cross, a scourge, and an oil lamp with a smoking flame. Finally, the Washington canvas shows the saint as a hermit contemplating the vanity of life: the light is behind the skull, which we see reflected in the mirror. Of all the different versions, The Met's painting is the most elegant, largely because of its luxurious trappings and the graceful turn of the head, but it is no less convincing than the others as a depiction of spiritual atonement.
Benedict Nicolson noticed that the mirror frame seen here is similar to one depicted in a portrait of Anna Eleonora Sanvitale, dated 1562, by Girolamo Mazzola Bedoli, in the Galleria Nazionale, Parma (Fahy 1973). Paul Levi pointed out that the appliqué decoration on the frame of the mirror resembles the ormolu work on a cabinet in the Bayerisches Nationalmuseum, Munich, by Christoph Angermair (ca. 1580–1633) or his circle (see Nicolson and Wright 1974). The discarded earrings are identical to those worn by the seated woman in La Tour’s Cheat with the Ace of Clubs in the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth (Cuzin 1997).
Two Magdalens are mentioned in early sources, but neither of them can be connected with the surviving canvases (Fahy 2005, p. 150 n. 9). In the absence of documentary evidence, the dating of La Tour’s Magdalens must remain speculative. According to recent theories about the artist’s chronology, the Wrightsman canvas is placed about 1640 (Cuzin 1997).
[2011; adapted from Fahy 2005]
private collection, bordering the Lorraine, France (by at least 1890; moved by son to the Côte d'Or in 1920, where it remained until 1963; sold to Heim); [Galerie Heim, Paris, 1963; sold to Wrightsman]; Mr. and Mrs. Charles Wrightsman, New York (1963–78; cat., 1973, no. 15)
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "The Painter's Light," October 5–November 10, 1971, no. 7 (as "The Repentant Magdalen," lent anonymously).
Paris. Orangerie des Tuileries. "Georges de La Tour," May 10–September 25, 1972, no. 19 (as "'La Madeleine Wrightsman' dite aussi 'Madeleine aux deux flammes,'" lent by M. et Mme Charles Wrightsman, New York).
Paris. Galeries nationales du Grand Palais. "Georges de La Tour," October 3, 1997–January 26, 1998, no. 39 (as "'La Madeleine pénitente,' dite aussi 'La Madeleine aux deux flammes' ou 'La Madeleine Wrightsman'").
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "Conversion by Candlelight: The Four Magdalens by Georges de La Tour (1593–1652)," February 10–March 15, 1998, checklist no. 4.
THIS WORK MAY NOT BE LENT, BY TERMS OF ITS ACQUISITION BY THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART.
François-Georges Pariset. "La Madeleine aux deux flammes: Un nouveau Georges de La Tour?" Bulletin de la Societé de l'Histoire de l'Art Français (1961–62), pp. 39–44, ill., proposes attributing the picture to Georges de La Tour and believes it is a late work; despite its seemingly modern design, views the ornate frame of the mirror as a product of La Tour's imagination, recalling engravings by Jaques Callot of around 1630 and Abraham Bosse of around 1640; interprets the discarded jewelry as a sign that the saint has only just renounced her worldly life; discusses the picture's provenance from about 1890.
François-Georges Pariset. "La Madeleine aux deux flammes." Le Pays Lorrain 43, no. 4 (1962), pp. 162–66, ill., calls it "La Madelaine aux deux flammes" and reports that cleaning has confirmed its attribution to La Tour; remarks that the jewelry at the saint's feet recalls the gold braid worn by the young man in La Tour's "Fortune Teller" (MMA 60.30); compares it stylistically to his "Flea Catcher" (Musée Historique Lorrain, Nancy); notes that after restoration the saint's profile appears identical to that of the Virgin Mary in an engraving attributed to Jean LeClerc.
Charles Oman. Letter to Francis Watson. November 9, 1965, agrees with Watson on dating the mirror to about 1630 and assigns the brass candlestick to the same period; identifies the frame as metal, probably silver but possibly silvered or tinned brass, based on the way the ornaments overlap the moldings.
Denys Sutton. "Pleasure for the Aesthete." Apollo 90 (September 1969), p. 232, no. 4, ill. p. 233, as probably from the 1630s.
Hidemichi Tanaka. "L'oeuvre de Georges de La Tour." PhD diss., Université de Strasbourg, 1969, pp. 73–75, 123, 127, 132, 165, pls. 6, 40-2 or 40-3 (overall and detail), dates it about 1625–28.
Benedict Nicolson. Letter to Anne Poulet. June 10, 1969, based on the tendency toward geometrical forms in the arms and skirt, and the design of the sleeves, assigns the picture to La Tour's middle period, the early to mid-1630s; considers it contemporary with the "Flea Catcher" (Musée Historique Lorrain, Nancy) and places it between the "Hurdy Gurdy Player" (Musée des Beaux-Arts, Nantes) and the "Newborn Child" (Musée des Beaux–Arts, Rennes); groups all La Tour's Magdalens within this same period.
John Walsh Jr. The Painter's Light. Exh. cat., The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1971, p. 6, no. 7, ill., dates it about 1645.
Pierre Rosenberg and Jacques Thuillier. Georges de La Tour. Exh. cat., Orangerie des Tuileries. Paris, 1972, pp. 177, 180, 183, no. 19, ill., frontispiece (detail), and pp. 46 (color detail), 176, group it stylistically with the "Flea Catcher" in Nancy and "Christ and Saint Joseph in the Carpenter's Shop" (Louvre, Paris), dating the three between 1639 and 1643.
Jacques Thuillier. "La Tour: Between Yesterday and Tomorrow." Art News 71 (Summer 1972), p. 25.
Robert Hughes. "An Analytical Stillness." Time Magazine (July 3, 1972), p. 53.
Julián Gállego. "Crónica de Paris: La Tour, Iluminado." Goya no. 109 (July–August 1972), p. 37.
Hélène Adhémar. "La Tour et les couvents lorrains." Gazette des beaux-arts, 6th ser., 80 (October 1972), pp. 219–20, fig. 1, posits a relationship between La Tour's Magdalens and the convent of Notre-Dame du Refuge, founded at Nancy in 1624 for "filles débauchées," who were urged to venerate the Magdalen; suggests that the Wrightsman Magdalen may be an evocation of the order's founder, Marie Élisabeth de Ranfaing, or some other nun from the convent.
François-Georges Pariset. "L'Exposition de Georges de La Tour à l'Orangerie, Paris." Gazette des beaux-arts, 6th ser., 80 (October 1972), p. 209.
Anthony Blunt. "Georges de La Tour at the Orangerie." Burlington Magazine 114 (August 1972), p. 520, calls it the earliest of La Tour's Penitent Magdalens, dating it between 1643 and 1645.
André Chastel. "À l'Orangerie: Le mystérieux Georges de La Tour." Le Monde (May 10, 1972), p. 17 [see Rosenberg and Macé de l'Épinay 1973].
André Fermigier. "Un dieu de la peinture pure." Le Nouvel Observateur (May 15–21, 1972) [see Thuillier 1973].
André Chastel. "La Tour perdu et retrouvé." Médecine de France (June 1972) [see Thuillier 1973].
Everett Fahy inThe Wrightsman Collection. Vol. 5, Paintings, Drawings. [New York], 1973, pp. 135–43, no. 15, ill. p. 137 (color), figs. 1–4, 7 (details), assigns it to the artist's middle period, the decade of the 1630s; notes that the same candlestick appears in La Tour's "Dream of Saint Joseph" (Musée des Beaux-Arts, Nantes); credits Benedict Nicolson with the observation that an early example of the type of mirror frame represented in the picture can be seen in Girolamo Mazzola Bedoli's portrait of Anna Eleonora Sanvitale (Galleria Nazionale, Parma), dated 1562.
Julius S. Held. "The Emergence of Georges de La Tour." Art in America 61 (July–August 1973), pp. 86–87, ill. p. 82 (color).
François Solesmes. Georges de La Tour. Lausanne, 1973, pp. 97, 100, 159, ill. pp. 96 (color), 159, relates the "Flea Catcher" to La Tour's Penitent Magdalens, specifically the Wrightsman picture.
Pierre Rosenberg and François Macé de L'Épinay. Georges de La Tour: vie et oeuvre. Fribourg, Switzerland, 1973, pp. 56–57, 140, 148–49, 154, 158, 199, no. 40, ill. (color, overall and detail; detail in black and white), interpret the iconography of this earliest episode in the Magdalen's conversion as a meditation on the theme of vanity, rather than mortality; state that the picture's vigorous coloring and strict geometry distinguish it from La Tour's early nocturnes, while its refined technique precludes a late date; date it between the "Dream of Saint Joseph" and the "Flea Catcher," stressing the closeness of the latter composition.
Jacques Thuillier. L'opera completa di Georges de La Tour. Milan, 1973, pp. 5, 7, 14, 94, ill. p. 94 and colorpls. XLII and XLIV (overall and detail).
Benedict Nicolson and Christopher Wright. Georges de La Tour. London, 1974, pp. 17, 35–36, 38–41, 47, 62 n. 11, p. 174, no. 28, fig. 76 (detail), pls. 56, 59 (overall and detail), ill. opp. p. 186 (color detail), propose a date about 1638–40; credit Paul Levi with the discovery of an ormolu picture frame attributed to the circle of Christoph Angemair (d. 1633) in the Bayerishes Nationalmuseum, Munich, which bears a strong stylistic resemblance to the mirror frame depicted here.
R. A. Cecil. "The Wrightsman Collection." Burlington Magazine 118 (July 1976), p. 518.
Christopher Wright. Georges de La Tour. London, 1977, p. 8.
Benedict Nicolson. The International Caravaggesque Movement. Oxford, 1979, p. 64 [2nd ed., rev. and enl. by Luisa Vertova, "Caravaggism in Europe," Turin, 1989, vol. 1, p. 134; vol. 2, pl. 906].
Katharine Baetjer and Dean Walker inThe Metropolitan Museum of Art: Notable Acquisitions, 1975–1979. New York, 1979, p. 51, ill. p. 51 (color) and on cover (color, cropped), date it between 1638 and 1643.
Howard Hibbard. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1980, pp. 302, 324, fig. 543 (color).
Pierre Rosenberg. France in the Golden Age: Seventeenth-century French Paintings in American Collections. Exh. cat., The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1982, pp. 75, 253, 355, ill. [French ed., La peinture française du XVIIe siècle dans les collections américaines, Paris].
Thierry Bajou. De La Tour. Paris, 1985, pp. 64, 68, 113, ill. pp. 59, 61 (color, overall and detail).
Pierre Rosenberg and Marion C. Stewart. French Paintings 1500–1825, The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. San Francisco, 1987, p. 60.
Calvin Tomkins. Merchants and Masterpieces: The Story of The Metropolitan Museum of Art. rev., enl. ed. New York, 1989, p. 390.
Philip Conisbee inThe Ahmanson Gifts: European Masterpieces in the Collection of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Los Angeles, 1991, p. 50, fig. 10b, states that it has the "abstract quality" of La Tour's work of the mid-1640s.
Agnès Lacau St Guily. La Tour, une lumière dans la nuit. [Paris], 1992, pp. 96–98, 102–4, ill. (color, overall and detail).
Jacques Thuillier. Georges de La Tour. Paris, 1992, pp. 152, 154, 158, 290, no. 51, ill. pp. 159–61 (color, overall and details), 290, discusses the picture's condition; states that it was discovered in the Côte d'Or by H[ubert]. Comte in 1961.
Anne Reinbold inGeorges de La Tour ou les chefs-d'oeuvre révélés. Exh. cat., Églises des Carmes, Vic-sur-Seille. Metz, 1993, pp. 126–27, pls. 20, 20' (overall and x-radiograph).
Geneviève Rodis-Lewis. "Les Madeleines de Georges de La Tour." Regards sur l'art. Paris, 1993, pp. 71–84.
Elisabeth Martin inGeorges de La Tour ou les chefs-d'oeuvre révélés. Exh. cat., Églises des Carmes, Vic-sur-Seille. Metz, 1993, p. 98, fig. 37 (detail).
Elisabeth Martin. "Dossiers scientifiques et repères chronologiques." Georges de La Tour ou la nuit traversée. Ed. Anne Reinbold. Metz, 1994, p. 22.
Julián Gállego inLos músicos de Georges de La Tour (1593–1652). Exh. cat., Museo del Prado. [Madrid], [1994], p. 43, fig. 27.
Anne Reinbold. "Examens en laboratoire et histoire de l'Art." Georges de La Tour ou la nuit traversée. Ed. Anne Reinbold. Metz, 1994, pp. 38–39, notes that there is no documentary or physical evidence to suggest that this picture was the first of La Tour's Magdalens.
Jean-Claude Le Floch. La Tour, le clair et l'obscur. Paris, 1995, pp. 34–35, ill. (color), identifies it as the first of La Tour's Magdalens; interprets the mirror, framed like a canvas, as a metaphor for the art of painting.
Katharine Baetjer. European Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art by Artists Born Before 1865: A Summary Catalogue. New York, 1995, p. 358, ill. p. 359.
Philip Conisbee et al. Georges de La Tour and his World. Exh. cat., National Gallery of Art. Washington, 1996, pp. 102, 109, 111–12, 114, fig. 70 (color), dates the picture between 1640 and 1644, shortly after the Louvre "Penitent Magdalen"; suggests a meaning for the candle in a quotation from Daniel Cramer's 1624 "Emblematum Sacrorum," where an emblem showing a skull surmounted by a candle being lit by a divine hand illustrates "the light shines in the darkness" (John 1:5) and is accompanied by Cramer's verse "sad and pale death cannot frighten whoever becomes familiar with it by frequent reflection; but with Christ in my heart I can overcome it; it is he who will reilluminate my light after death".
Paulette Choné. Georges de La Tour: Un peintre lorrain au XVIIe siècle. Paris, 1996, pp. 140–45, ill. (color).
Jean-Pierre Cuzin and Dimitri Salmon. Georges de la Tour: Histoire d'une redécouverte. Paris, 1997, p. 85, between pp. 88 and 89, p. 105, ill. on cover, p. 84, and between pp. 88 and 89 (color, overall and details).
Jean-Pierre Cuzin inGeorges de La Tour. Exh. cat., Galeries nationales du Grand Palais. Paris, 1997, pp. 186, 199, 202–5, no. 39, ill. (color, overall and details), notes that the Magdalen's discarded earrings are identical to those worn by the seated woman in the "Cheat with the Ace of Clubs" (Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth); dates the picture close to the "Dream of Saint Joseph" and "Christ and Saint Joseph in the Carpenter's Shop," i.e., about 1640.
Robert Fohr. Georges de La Tour: Le maître des nuits. Paris, 1997, p. 83, ill. p. 65 (color) and on front cover (color, cropped).
Sylvie Germain. "Solitudes de Madeleine." L'Oeil no. 489 (October 1997), pp. 80–88, 104–5, ill. (color, overall and details), sees La Tour's paintings of the Magdalen as representing the lover as depicted in the Song of Songs.
Pierre Rosenberg and Bruno Ferté. La Tour. Milan, 1998, pp. 13, 19–20, 79, 82, 86, 122, no. 22, ill. pp. 82–85 (color, overall and details), and ill. p. 122.
Georges de La Tour. Hôtel des Ventes de Neuilly. June 23, 1998, pp. 5, 8, 13, 16, ill.
Jean-Pierre Cuzin inLe Saint Sébastien soigné par Irène de Georges de La Tour. Exh. cat., Musée des Beaux-Arts d'Orléans. [Orléans], [1998], pp. 13–14, fig. 9.
Bruno Ferté inLa luce del vero: Caravaggio, La Tour, Rembrandt, Zurbarán. Exh. cat., Galleria d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Bergamo. Cinisello Balsamo (Milan), 2000, p. 100.
Everett Fahy inThe Wrightsman Pictures. Ed. Everett Fahy. New York, 2005, pp. 146–50, no. 41, ill. (color).
Jean-Pierre Cuzin inGeorges de La Tour. Exh. cat., National Museum of Western Art. Tokyo, 2005, p. 82, fig. 16-8, under no. 16, pp. 202, 209–10, 227, fig. 23 (color).
Arnauld Brejon de Lavergnée inCaravaggio: The Final Years. Exh. cat., Museo di Capodimonte. Naples, 2005, p. 165 [Italian ed., "Caravaggio: l'ultimo tempo 1606–1610," 2004].
James Conlon. "Men Reading Women Reading: Interpreting Images of Women Readers." Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 26, no. 2 (2005), pp. 49, 57 n. 11, as "Repentant Magdalen (with Two Flames—Wrightsman)"; calls the moment of conversion "the moment of changing her conventional desire into a desire of her own".
Keith Christiansen inPhilippe de Montebello and The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1977–2008. New York, 2009, p. 34.
Everett Fahy inPhilippe de Montebello and The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1977–2008. New York, 2009, p. 32, fig. 44 (color).
Jean-Pierre Cuzin. Figures de la réalité: Caravagesques français, Georges de La Tour, les frères Le Nain . . . [Paris], 2010, pp. 215, 218, 244, 257, 259, fig. 215 (color), reprints Cuzin 1998 and 2005.
Jean-Patrice Marandel inCorps et ombres: Caravage et le caravagisme européen. Ed. Michel Hilaire and Axel Hémery. Exh. cat., Musée Fabre, Montpellier and Musée des Augustins, Toulouse. Milan, 2012, p. 470 [English ed., "Caravaggio and His Legacy," Los Angeles, p. 153].
Guillaume Kazerouni inGeorges de La Tour, 1593–1652. Ed. Dimitri Salmon and Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos. Exh. cat., Museo Nacional del Prado. Madrid, 2016, p. 20, fig. 9 (color).
Dimitri Salmon inGeorges de La Tour, 1593–1652. Ed. Dimitri Salmon and Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos. Exh. cat., Museo Nacional del Prado. Madrid, 2016, p. 55.
Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos inGeorges de La Tour, 1593–1652. Ed. Dimitri Salmon and Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos. Exh. cat., Museo Nacional del Prado. Madrid, 2016, p. 83.
Jean-Patrice Marandel inGeorges de La Tour, 1593–1652. Ed. Dimitri Salmon and Andrés Úbeda de los Cobos. Exh. cat., Museo Nacional del Prado. Madrid, 2016, p. 136, under nos. 21–22.
Pierre Rosenberg. "Georges de La Tour: Madrid." Burlington Magazine 158 (June 2016), p. 489.
Dalia Judovitz. Georges de La Tour and the Enigma of the Visible. New York, 2018, pp. 26–28, colorpl. 5.
Nancy Kenney. "Jayne Wrightsman Leaves Over 375 Works of Art and $80m to The Met." Art Newspaper. November 13, 2019, ill. (color, photograph of Jayne Wrightsman in front of the painting) [http://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/jayne-wrightsman-leaves-over-375-works-of-art-to-the-met].
The Private Collection of Jayne Wrightsman. Christie's, New York
. October 14, 2020, p. 29.
This work may not be lent, by terms of its acquisition by The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Artist in Residence Peter Hristoff meditates on the use of symbols in art as a means of communicating information about the artist, culture, time period, and even ourselves.
The Met's Libraries and Research Centers provide unparalleled resources for research and welcome an international community of students and scholars.
The Met Collection API is where all makers, creators, researchers, and dreamers can connect to the most up-to-date data and public domain images for The Met collection. Open Access data and public domain images are available for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use without permission or fee.
Feedback
We continue to research and examine historical and cultural context for objects in The Met collection. If you have comments or questions about this object record, please complete and submit this form. The Museum looks forward to receiving your comments.
