Design, 1975–2000

The last quarter of the twentieth century saw a surge of unbridled consumerism manifested in a number of diverse, often contradictory, design currents.
A slider containing 15 items.
Press the down key to skip to the last item.
"Vertebra" Armchair, Emilio Ambasz  Argentinian, Polyurethane and leather
Emilio Ambasz
Giancarlo Piretti
1974–76
Evolutionary Phases, Diane Itter  American, Linen
Diane Itter
1979
"Carlton" Room Divider, Ettore Sottsass  Italian, born Austria, Wood, plastic laminate
Ettore Sottsass
Memphis Milano
1981
"Murmansk" Fruit Dish, Ettore Sottsass  Italian, born Austria, Silver
Ettore Sottsass
Rossi e Arcandi, Vicenza
1982
"Queen Anne" Side Chair, Robert Venturi  American, Molded plywood with laminated finish
Robert Venturi
Knoll
1984
"Alada" Table, Oscar Tusquets Blanca  Spanish, Painted wood, etched glass, and bronze
Oscar Tusquets Blanca
CASAS
ca. 1985
"How High the Moon" Armchair, Shiro Kuramata  Japanese, Nickel-plated steel mesh
Shiro Kuramata
Vitra
1986
"Nomos" Table, Sir Norman Foster  British, Glass, stainless steel, plastics (rubber, polyamide/nylon, polyurethane ether)
Sir Norman Foster
Tecno S.p.A.
1987
Vase, Zenji Miyashita  Japanese, Stoneware
Zenji Miyashita
ca. 1990
London Papardelle, Ron Arad  British, Blackened bronze
Ron Arad
1992
Untitled, Geert Lap  Dutch, Stoneware
Geert Lap
1993
Untitled, Magdalene Odundo  British, Red clay
Magdalene Odundo
1997
Vestment II, Stanislav Libensky  Czech, Glass
Stanislav Libensky
Jaroslava Brychtová
1997
"Burner Dye" (fabric no. 9-361), Reiko Sudo  Japanese, Stainless steel, cotton
Reiko Sudo
Nuno Corporation
2000
Umbra 30, Olga de Amaral  Colombian, Linen, silver leaf, gesso, acrylic paint
Olga de Amaral
2003

The last quarter of the twentieth century saw a surge of unbridled consumerism manifested in a number of diverse, often contradictory, design currents. Some architects and designers chose to conform to the previously established intellectual strictures of modernism, seeking expression through form rather than applied ornament. Others, inspired by texts that denounced the cool aridity of modernism—including Robert Venturi’s Learning from Las Vegas (1972), Collage City (1978) by Colin Rowe and Fred Koetter, and Rem Koolhaas’ Delirious New York (1978)—developed a postmodernism that celebrated the vernacular and reinterpreted motifs of the past. Still others used the design of objects as a means to make countercultural social or political statements. Many of the leaders of the Studio Craft movement consciously abandoned the creation of useful objects in favor of nonfunctional art. Toward the end of the 1980s, designers, recognizing the inherent beauty of materials developed for science, began to employ them in a wide range of consumer products. In the century’s last decade, the environment became a major concern for designers offering “green,” socially responsible solutions to design problems

Late Modernism
International Style architecture developed in Europe between the world wars and dominated design throughout the twentieth century. From 1975 onward, late modernist projects were guided by the conviction that rationalist architecture had yet to be fully realized. Designers sought to integrate modern technology with formal elements derived from the basic grid. The use of industrial materials—predominantly stainless steel and other metals—and of minimalist, linear forms evokes the language of the idealistic International Style as well as a Japanese design philosophy of doing more with less.

Historicism
From the late 1970s through the 1980s, many architects and designers, reacting against the dictates of modernism, looked to Neoclassical forms and materials for inspiration. Visual references derived from art and architecture superseded functionalism, and overt historical references and decoration transformed architecture, furniture, tabletop accessories, even jewelry, into objects of fantasy. Well-known architects Michael Graves, Robert Venturi, and others accepted commissions to design products for such diverse international companies as Knoll, Alessi, and Formica.

Memphis and Postmodern Italian Design
An antidesign movement energized Italian design throughout the 1960s and ’70s. Such radical design groups as Archizoom, Superstudio, and Studio Alchimia were established in opposition to the pure functionalism of the International Style. In 1981, Ettore Sottsass formed a loosely organized group to pursue an ironic approach to design in which surface decoration was paramount. When the group met one evening at Sottsass’ home, Bob Dylan’s song “Stuck Inside of Mobile with the Memphis Blues Again” was playing. Struck by the diverse implications of “Memphis,” the designers adopted the name. It suggested not only the typical American city, the blues, and suburbia, but also conjured visions of the ancient Egyptian capital, thus signaling contemporary and historical meaning as well as high and low culture. Memphis annually introduced new furniture, lighting, textiles, ceramics, and glass objects in Milan from 1981 through the late 1980s.


Contributors

Jane Adlin
Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

October 2004


Further Reading

Adlin, Jane. Contemporary Ceramics: Selections from the Collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1998. See on MetPublications

Fiell, Charlotte, and Peter Fiell. Design of the 20th Century. Cologne: Taschen, 1999.

Miller, R. Craig. Modern Design in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1890–1990. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art , 1990. See on MetPublications


Citation

View Citations

Adlin, Jane. “Design, 1975–2000.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/dsgn4/hd_dsgn4.htm (October 2004)