Capac Hucha as an Inca Assemblage

See works of art
  • Coca Bag
    1994.35.88
  • Headband
    1994.35.783
  • Miniature Tunic
    1994.35.114
  • Tunic
    2005.288
  • Tunic
    1979.206.954
  • Storage Jar (Aryballos)
    1978.412.68
  • Llama
    1974.271.36
  • Female figure
    1979.206.1058
  • Female figure
    1995.481.5
  • Kero
    1996.225
  • Miniature Dish with Handle
    66.30.9
  • Miniature Vessel
    66.30.10
  • Miniature Vessel
    66.30.12
  • Storage Jar (Aryballus)
    66.30.11
  • Male figure
    1974.271.7
  • Pin (tupu)
    64.228.702
  • Pin (tupu)
    64.228.703
  • Copper Pin
    1987.394.620
  • Standing Figure
    1987.394.417
  • Female Figurine
    1974.271.8
  • Kero
    2004.212
  • Standing Silver Female Figure
    1979.206.336
  • Coca Bag
    1994.35.177

Works of Art (24)

Essay

Andean communities revere certain points in the landscape and may refer to them, along with rocks and representations of humans or animals, as huacas, a Quechua and Aymara term for “sacred being.” These huacas can be the sites or components of ritualized offerings. Spanish colonists wrote about one ceremony involving such offerings that was performed by the Incas (ca. 1400–1533) throughout the Andes. This ceremony, known as capac hucha, also spelled as capac cocha or qhapaq hucha, or “royal obligation” in Quechua, reportedly occurred to mark natural events like a drought or the accession or death of an Inca ruler. The spatial aspect of this ceremony helped to mark the limits of the empire while also bringing the “ancestral power of the landscape” into the fabric of the Inca regime (Jacob and Liebowicz 2014). The performance began in Cuzco, the Inca capital, with the marriage of juveniles selected by Inca nobility. The juveniles, wearing a range of ornaments, were taken on processions to different locations, where they were killed and buried with varied materials, including metals.

In recent decades, excavation teams have recovered human bodies deposited in bundles with artifacts and have correlated these finds with those of the capac hucha ceremony as described by Spanish chroniclers. These depositions, some of which lack human remains but include common capac hucha artifacts, have been identified on or near mountaintops, in lowland areas, or on the coast; they may be found in association with a natural resource, such as water (Lake Titicaca) and ores (Cerro Esmeralda). In the case of depositions associated with mountains, or apus, the Quechua term for the mountains as beings, the capac hucha finds may be embedded in wider high-altitude Inca settlements that involved pre-Inca occupations.

At Cerro Aconcagua in Argentina, at 5,300 m.a.s.l., well below the summit of the mountain, archaeologists recovered the remains of a seven-year-old boy dressed in uncus (tunics) of wool (1979.206.954; 2005.288), a yaqolla (mantle) of wool and cotton, sandals of vegetable fiber, and a featherwork headdress. Evaluation of the textile adornments has led investigators to identify an influence from coastal Peru, while pollen remains on the funerary bundle suggest that it was prepared below 3,700 m.a.s.l. Along with these items, archaeologists found small figurines of metal and Spondylus depicting human males and camelids. The human figurines were dressed in textiles, having their own miniature uncus (1994.35.114), yaqollas, and chuspas, or bags for coca (1994.35.177; 1994.35.88). Based on radiocarbon dating of the human remains, they propose that the boy died between 1480 and 1533, noting that Inca hegemony in this area of Argentina emerged around 1475.

At Choquepujio (or Choquepukio) (3,138 m.a.s.l.) in Peru, within an Inca building centered among several pre-Inca structures, archaeologists uncovered the remains of seven male and female juveniles, adorned with textiles and accompanied by dressed figurines in addition to a range of Inca ceramics, including pairs of plates (66.30.9; 66.30.10), ollas, or cooking vessels (66.30.12), and chicha (maize beer) containers often described as having an aryballos form (66.30.11; 1978.412.68). Tupus, or metal pins (64.228.702; 64.228.703), were found with the remains of the female children, and miniature versions of these pins (1987.394.620) were recovered with female figurines. Much like the tupus worn by Andean women today, these pins were used to fasten the textiles around the human body or, as miniatures, around the metal or shell figurine. While tupus tend to be found in burials of women, the indicated sex of figurines does not always correlate with that of the associated human remains. At Choquepujio, a male camelid figurine (1974.271.36) was associated with a female human burial, and two female camelid figurines with a male human burial.

The metal figurines, while occasionally made by casting, were typically fabricated by hammering pieces of sheet and joining them through techniques such as soldering. The figurines tend to be made of copper, silver, or gold, separately or as alloys, and usually fall into three height groups (approximately 5–7, 13–15, and 22–24 cm). This item is a hallmark of individuals who are “Incas by privilege,” a status ascribed as an Inca strategy to bring members of local communities into the Inca ranks as their empire expanded. Another feature of these figurines (1974.271.7; 1987.394.417) is their extended earlobes, which could have accommodated earplugs, as worn by Inca nobility. The male figurines, in metal or shell, may show a cord wrapped around the head. In other contexts, such cords may be made of woven camelid fiber and tied around the head of human bodies in burial (cf. 1994.35.783 as a possible headband). The female figurines (1974.271.8; 1979.206.336; 1979.206.1058; 1995.481.5) typically show an individual with arms and hands pulled close to the chest and hair tied back in two tresses. The general shape and decoration of the metal figurines is also seen on the shell figurines but usually in less detail.

The question of what materials constitute a capac hucha deposition is not resolved. At Huaca de la Luna, a primarily Moche site in Peru, a dressed Spondylus figurine similar to those from Choquepujio and other sites was recovered but in the absence of human remains. At Cuzco, in the main plaza, or Haukaypata, excavators encountered a line of metal and shell camelid figurines also without human remains or other components typically associated with capac hucha sites. Indeed, the capac hucha depositions may be seen as part of a larger universe of Andean material offerings and dedications of sacred space. The origins of the children or of the fabricated materials that accompanied them in these depositions are also questions under consideration. Still, the incorporation of shell in mountaintop depositions or of metal in coastal or lowland offerings suggests that the ritualized production of capac hucha assemblages yielded a web of relatively distant human actors, who, with the materials they fabricated, became linked to a particular sacred space, or huaca.

While figurines in metal and shell, dressed with textiles, featherwork, and tupus, along with ceramic vessels are frequent components of these assemblages, other artifacts were occasionally included, such as a large stone ax (Isla de la Plata off the coast of Ecuador), turquoise beads (Guacolda in Chile), and copper rings (Salinas Grandes in Argentina). Wooden keros, or drinking vessels (1996.225; 2004.212), have been excavated in Ampato in Peru and at Llullaillaco, an apu in northwestern Argentina. These works in varied media, along with the human remains and the place of their deposition (including the soil and the climate), comprise “assemblages”: it is the interactions of these different components, rather than the individual entities, that produce the assemblage. They cover, fasten, or tie each other, hiding or obscuring some of the other components from an external viewer. The figurines and other artifacts have their own camay, a Quechua term that suggests an “energizing power.” They do not represent; rather, they act, interact, and produce. Thus, their unwrapping, separation, and accession into collections likely have altered how they work together as social actors.

The extraction of these assemblages has had a long history. In 1891–92, on assignment for the World’s Columbian Exposition, George Dorsey, who at one time was arrested for desecrating native burials on the Northwest Coast, worked with the Ecuadorian army to excavate a capac hucha deposition at Isla de la Plata. In 1999, North American–led teams, with the assistance of the Argentine army, extracted the deposition at Llullaillaco. The archaeological project at Llullaillaco and other recent excavations have been conducted with little collaboration with local archaeologists or with descendant communities. Los Airampos, a community of Kollas, who identify as descendants of the Incas, has objected to the excavation and exhibition of materials from Llullaillaco because the site is sacred to them.

Bryan Cockrell
Art of the Ancient Americas, Department of the Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

November 2017

Citation

Cockrell, Bryan. “Capac Hucha as an Inca Assemblage.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/capa/hd_capa.htm (November 2017)

Further Reading

DeLanda, Manuel. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum, 2006.

Gibaja Oviedo, Arminda M., Gordon F. McEwan, Melissa Chatfield, and Valerie Andrushko. “Informe de las posibles capacochas del asentamiento arqueológico de Choquepujio, Cusco, Perú.” Ñawpa Pacha 34 (2014), pp. 147–75, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/0077629714Z.00000000019.

Jacob, Cristian, and Iván Leibowicz. “Ceremonias en la tormenta: Ritual inka en el Nevado de Cachi.” Estudios Antropología. Historia. Nueva Serie. Revista del Museo Arqueológico Pío Pablo Díaz de Cachi 2 (2014), pp. 27–48.

Pearlstein, E., Mark Mackenzie, Emily Kaplan, Ellen Howe, and Judith Levinson. “Tradition and Innovation: Cochineal and Andean Keros.” In A Red Like No Other: How Cochineal Colored the World, edited by Carmella Padilla and Barbara C. Anderson, pp. 44–51. New York: Skira, 2015.

Schobinger, Juan, ed. El santuario incaico del cerro Aconcagua. Mendoza: EDIUNC, 2001.

Politis, Gustavo. “On Archaeological Praxis, Gender Bias and Indigenous Peoples in South America.” Journal of Social Archaeology 1, no. 1 (2001), pp. 90–107, at https://doi.org/10.1177/146960530100100107.

Related