Fragonard probably painted this scene toward the end of his first trip to Italy. His impetuous technique falls between the usual stages of preparatory sketch and finished work (though this painting’s surface has also suffered wear). Like his contemporary Hubert Robert, Fragonard was fascinated by how eighteenth-century Romans occupied the remains of the city’s unrestored, ancient ruins: here, a bustling laundry has been improvised amidst enormous, antique columns and a sacrificial altar.
Due to rights restrictions, this image cannot be enlarged, viewed at full screen, or downloaded.
Open Access
As part of the Met's Open Access policy, you can freely copy, modify and distribute this image, even for commercial purposes.
API
Public domain data for this object can also be accessed using the Met's Open Access API.
Both Fragonard and Hubert Robert were fascinated by the unrestored ancient ruins of Rome in which boarded off interior spaces were used for stables and laundries. People lived in the ruins too, as this painting and others appear to demonstrate. The picture is first recorded in 1884, in the catalogue of a public auction, as the interior of an Italian house; in 1955, it was retitled The Italian Family. Neither is accurate, as the building is not a house and the figures are too many and not of the right ages for a family group. The enormously high columns and stone platform, as well as an antique altar in the right foreground, indicate an ancient structure that has been adapted to a practical day to day use. The figures include two infants, one in a cradle, three little girls, and several young women. Clearly, at least two of the latter are laundresses.
Other paintings and drawings by the two artists show cavernous interiors with peasants tending cauldrons of boiling linen. The evaporating moisture rises in clouds while the women and girls spread out the laundry or hang it up to dry. The tenebrous lighting must in part reflect sights Fragonard saw in Rome. The influence of Rembrandt and other northern artists, of Neapolitan painting, and of the Bolognese school have also been suggested. While the date proposed for the painting is very likely, it is not certain that all the works by Fragonard that depict subjects of the kind were painted in Italy. The Met's picture should be associated with a similar painting (private collection) in which the central figure, also brilliantly illuminated, holds two babies in her arms.
Whatever the setting or implied narrative, the young mother in the yellow skirt and her baby wrapped in white, fixed in a blaze of light, are the real subject. Fragonard’s wide, viscous strokes convey their warmth and corporeality, and the physical intimacy between them. The brown dog and the white cat impart an echo of domestic harmony.
Katharine Baetjer 2011
private collection (until 1884; sale, Hôtel Drouot, Paris, May 12, 1884, no. 21, as "Intérieur de maison italienne," for Fr 850); Georges Moreau-Chaslon, Paris ( in 1889); ?Charles Edward Haviland, Paris; [Jacques Seligmann, Paris, until 1917; sold to Knoedler]; [Knoedler, Paris and New York, 1917–at least 1924]; ?Alfred Löwenstein, Brussels (d. 1928); ?[Partridge Fine Art, London, by 1939–at least 1940]; [Howard Back, New York, until 1946; sold to The Met]
New York. Knoedler. "Masters of the Loaded Brush: Oil Sketches from Rubens to Tiepolo," April 4–29, 1967, no. 69.
Yokohama Museum of Art. "Treasures from The Metropolitan Museum of Art: French Art from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century," March 25–June 4, 1989, no. 46.
Rome. Villa Medici. "J. H. Fragonard e H. Robert a Roma," December 6, 1990–February 24, 1991, no. 38.
Athens. National Gallery Alexandros Soutzos Museum. "From El Greco to Cézanne: Masterpieces of European Painting from the National Gallery of Art, Washington, and The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York," December 13, 1992–April 11, 1993, no. 28.
Roger Portalis. Honoré Fragonard, sa vie et son oeuvre. Paris, 1889, vol. 2, p. 279, as "Intérieur rustique italien," with G. Moreau-Chaslon.
Josephine L. Allen and Elizabeth E. Gardner. A Concise Catalogue of the European Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1954, p. 37.
Charles Sterling. The Metropolitan Museum of Art: A Catalogue of French Paintings. Vol. 1, XV–XVIII Centuries. Cambridge, Mass., 1955, pp. 152–53, ill., as “The Italian Family”; notes Fragonard’s connection with Robert in Rome; dates our picture between 1761 and 1764 and finds it close to the “Washerwomen” in St. Louis; suggests the influence of Rembrandt--noting that Fragonard had copied that artist’s “Holy Family” in the Crozat collection before he went to Italy—and perhaps also of Pietro da Cortona, Piazzetta, and Johann Liss.
Louis Réau. Fragonard, sa vie et son oeuvre. Brussels, 1956, pp. 168, 270.
Georges Wildenstein. The Paintings of Fragonard, Complete Edition. London, 1960, pp. 24, 279, no. 365, pl. 73, lists it with Italian subjects dating to about 1774; adds to the group two related works, formerly with the marquis de Larios (no. 363) and formerly with the marquis de Ganay (no. 364).
Jacques Thuillier. Fragonard. English ed. Geneva, 1967, p. 49, believes that paintings with such typically Italian subject matter must date to the artist’s first stay in Rome, but that there may be later replicas.
Carla Lord inMasters of the Loaded Brush. Exh. cat., M. Knoedler & Co. New York, 1967, pp. 94–95, no. 69, ill., judges our picture to be the first of the three versions mentioned by Wildenstein, and dates them after Fragonard’s first trip to Italy; suggests the possible influence of Crespi’s family groups, which the artist could have seen in Bologna in 1761.
Gabriele Mandel inL'opera completa di Fragonard. Milan, 1972, pp. 102–3, no. 388, ill., as from Fragonard’s second trip to Italy, and probably preliminary to Wildenstein nos. 363–64.
Howard Hibbard. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1980, p. 364, fig. 660, dates it about 1760?.
Denys Sutton. Fragonard. Exh. cat., National Museum of Western Art. Tokyo, 1980, unpaginated, under no. 55, refers to it as "the freest of the three" and perhaps his first idea.
Eric M. Zafran. The Rococo Age: French Masterpieces of the Eighteenth Century. Exh. cat., High Museum of Art. Atlanta, 1983, pp. 116–17, under no. 51, discusses it in relation to the painting in St. Louis, dating the works shortly after Fragonard's visit to Venice in 1761.
Pierre Cabanne. Fragonard. Paris, 1987, p. 109.
Jean-Pierre Cuzin. Jean-Honoré Fragonard: Vie et oeuvre, catalogue complet des peintures. Fribourg, Switzerland, 1987, p. 273, no. 74, ill. p. 273 and fig. 60, together with the paintings in St. Louis and Rouen, dates it about 1759–60.
Pierre Rosenberg. Fragonard. Exh. cat., The Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 1988, p. 92, under no. 23, fig. 2 [French ed., 1987, as "L'heureuse mère"], as "The Happy Mother"; compares it to the painting in a private collection, Paris [Wildenstein no. 364]; notes that while The Met's canvas is sketchier, the damaged condition makes it difficult to tell whether or not it is earlier, while the Paris version is in perfect state; dates both to about 1760; illustrates Wildenstein no. 363 as "Attributed to Fragonard".
Pierre Rosenberg. Tout l'oeuvre peint de Fragonard. Paris, 1989, pp. 78–79, no. 79, ill.
Jean-Pierre Cuzin and Pierre Rosenberg inJ. H. Fragonard e H. Robert a Roma. Exh. cat., Villa Medici. Rome, 1990, pp. 29, 91–92, no. 38, ill., identify two versions as by Fragonard, the present picture and Wildenstein no. 364, while describing no. 363 as of doubtful authenticity.
Katharine Baetjer. European Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art by Artists Born Before 1865: A Summary Catalogue. New York, 1995, p. 381, ill.
Ewa Lajer-Burcharth. "Fragonard in Detail." Differences 14 (Fall 2003), pp. 51–52, fig. 14, addresses the erotic nature of Fragonard's vision.
Ewa Lajer-Burcharth. "Genre and Sex." French Genre Painting in the Eighteenth Century. Ed. Philip Conisbee. Washington, 2007, pp. 204–5, 207–10, fig. 10, argues for the organic, generative nature of the depiction.
Old Masters. Christie's, New York. April 27, 2017, unpaginated, under no. 36, as "The Happy Mother".
Ewa Lajer-Burcharth. The Painter's Touch: Boucher, Chardin, Fragonard. Princeton, 2018, pp. 205–6, fig. 3.43 (color), draws attention to the thickness of the pigment from which the forms are emerging, and touches on Pierre-Jean Mariette's remark that Fragonard erased and repainted; uses "Italian Family" as title.
Katharine Baetjer. French Paintings in The Metropolitan Museum of Art from the Early Eighteenth Century through the Revolution. New York, 2019, pp. 250–53, no. 78, ill. (color).
Holland Cotter. "The Met Casts New Light on Hit Works and History." New York Times (December 25, 2020), p. C1 [online ed., "The Met Casts New Light on its Greatest Hits and History," December 24, 2020, ill. (color, installation view); https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/24/arts/design/metropolitan-museum-european-paintings-skylights.html].
Colin B. Bailey. "Review of Baetjer 2019." Burlington Magazine 163 (May 2021), p. 472, suggests that the original support was paper.
Jean Honoré Fragonard (French, Grasse 1732–1806 Paris)
mid-1770s
Resources for Research
The Met's Libraries and Research Centers provide unparalleled resources for research and welcome an international community of students and scholars.
The Met Collection API is where all makers, creators, researchers, and dreamers can connect to the most up-to-date data and public domain images for The Met collection. Open Access data and public domain images are available for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use without permission or fee.
Feedback
We continue to research and examine historical and cultural context for objects in The Met collection. If you have comments or questions about this object record, please complete and submit this form. The Museum looks forward to receiving your comments.
