King Dasharatha emerges in the Ramayana as essentially a noble character, though flawed by the weakness that allowed him to be swayed by his second wife Kaikeyi, whose ambitions for her own son caused the king to banish the crown prince Rama for fourteen years. Having succumbed to this pressure, Dasharatha, plagued by regrets, took to his sickbed, where he eventually died of grief. The sorrow of his queens and female attendants is conveyed by their disheveled hair and by the cradling of their cheeks in their hands.
This image cannot be enlarged, viewed at full screen, or downloaded.
Open Access
As part of the Met's Open Access policy, you can freely copy, modify and distribute this image, even for commercial purposes.
API
Public domain data for this object can also be accessed using the Met's Open Access API.
This artwork is meant to be viewed from right to left. Scroll left to view more.
Artwork Details
Use your arrow keys to navigate the tabs below, and your tab key to choose an item
Title:"The Death of King Dasharatha, the Father of Rama", Folio from a Ramayana
Date:ca. 1605
Geography:Attributed to India
Medium:Opaque watercolor and gold on paper
Dimensions:Painting: H. 10 1/2 in. (26.7 cm) W. 5 13/16 in. (14.8 cm) Page: H. 10 7/8 in. (27.6 cm) W. 7 1/2 in. (19.1 cm) Mat: H. 19 1/4 in. (48.9 cm) W. 14 1/4 in. (36.2 cm)
Classification:Codices
Credit Line:Cynthia Hazen Polsky and Leon B. Polsky Fund, 2002
Object Number:2002.506
Four folios from the Ramayana (nos. 2002.503, .506, .505, .504)
The Indian epic poem Ramayana recounts the tale of the legendary prince Rama and his battle against Ravana, the king of the demons, which Rama fought and won with the aid of the monkey and bear armies. In contrast to other Ramayana manuscripts of this period, which were translated into Persian at the order of the Mughal emperor Akbar (r. 1556–1605), this particular series retains its original Sanskrit text, an indication that it was probably made for a Hindu patron.[1] Its provenance from the Datia collection and the existence of pale traces of drawings on the reverse in a Datia style suggest that the patron may have been the wealthy Bundela Rajput noble Bir Singh Deo Bundela (d. 1627). Bir Singh was prominent at the Mughal court, supporting Prince Salim in his rebellion against Akbar and infamously remembered as the assassin of Abu’l Fazl. As a court noble he was able to patronize Mughal-trained artists (although ones of lesser fame than those in the employ of the emperor) in the practice known as subimperial patronage, which is confirmed here by the characteristic simplified Mughal style of these paintings.
These painted folios were never bound with a continuous text; rather each illustrated leaf had selected passages written on the reverse. Damage from a fire soon after the completion of the series explains the irregular shape of the pages, but their essential compositions and palpable liveliness still survive. The series contained an unknown number of painted folios executed by a group of minor artists, who have been associated with other subimperial projects and who may have been dismissed from the imperial atelier at the end of Akbar’s reign.[2] The multiple hands involved drew upon a variety of sources—both from the imperial Mughal style and from farther afield—and contributed an inventive approach to pattern and space. As a result, the manuscript has a richly flavored character, which is reflected in the Metropolitan’s folios, some of which show influences from Persian models as well as Indian styles.
The brilliant red color and oversized Chinese ribbon cloud seen in "Rama Receives Sugriva and Jambavat" (no. 2002.503)) reflect the strong palette and forms of Rajput painting and contrast with the more classically restrained Mughal approach in "Kumbhakarna in the Golden City of Lanka" (no. 2002.504). Understated emotion is conveyed in "The Death of King Dasharatha" (no. 2002.506), which shows the blind king’s three wives pulling their hair loose in an expression of grief. Also seen on other folios, the juxtaposition of patterns here appears to be a throwback to Mughal projects of an earlier period such as the Hamzanama.[3] Oversized clouds and the employment of the figure style suggest that the artist might have been the same as in the previous folio depicting Rama. "The Court of Ravana" (no. 2002.505), which shows the ten-headed demon and his son Indrajit holding durbar, is the most unusual in style, with a bolder, less refined handling of the demons, who are nonetheless appealingly characterized. The Persianate div models upon which the demons are ultimately based, the blue-and-white-tiled iwan arch in the background, and, more remotely, the tiered composition indicate that the artist was aware of Shiraz and other Persian painting styles. In the folio depicting Ravana’s brother, the giant Kumbhkarna, being awakened by demons, similar div figures are treated in a far more refined manner.
Navina Haidar in [Ekhtiar, Soucek, Canby, and Haidar 2011]
Footnotes:
1. All four folios here are published: Navina Haidar in Topsfield 2004, pp. 360, 367, figs 159–62. Further pages from the same series are on pp. 354–55, figs. 157–58. Further leaves from the same series are illustrated in the following: Chandra, Pramod. “A Series of Ramayana Paintings of the Popular Mughal School.” Prince of Wales Museum Bulletin, no. 6 (1957–59), pp. 64–70,figs. 18–27; Chandra, Pramod. “Ustad Salivahana and the Development of Popular Mughal Art.” Lalit Kala, no. 8 (October 1960), pp. 25–46, fig. 16; Gairola, C. Krishna.“Paintings from India, Nepal and Tibet.” Arts in Virginia 2, no. 1 (Fall 1970), pp. 4–23, no. 8; Indian Miniature Painting from the Collection of Edwin Binney, 3rd. Vol. 1, The Mughal and Deccani Schools with Some Related Sultanate Material. Exhibition, Portland Art Museum and other venues. Catalogue by Edwin Binney, 3rd. Portland, Ore., 1973, nos. 24, 34; The Imperial Image: Paintings for the Mughal Court. Exhibition, Freer Gallery of Art, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Catalogue by Milo Cleveland Beach. Washington, D.C., 1981, p. 130, fig. 18; Indian Painting, 1525–1825. Exhibition, David Carritt Limited, London. Catalogue by Terence McInerney. London, 1982., nos. 6–7; In the Image of Man: The Indian Perception of the Universe through 2000 Years of Painting and Sculpture. Exhibition, Hayward Gallery, London. Catalogue by George Michell, Catherine Lampert, and Tristram Holland. London, 1982, pp. 82–83, 205, no. 382; Indian Miniatures: The Ehrenfeld Collection. Exhibition, American Federation of Arts, New York, and other venues. Catalogue by Daniel J. Ehnbom, with Robert Skelton and Pramod Chandra. New York, 1985, no. 15; Indian Paintings and Drawings from the Collection of Howard Hodgkin. Exhibition, British Museum, London; Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.; Museum Rietberg Zürich; Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. Catalogue by Andrew Topsfield and Milo Cleveland Beach. New York and London, 1991, no. 4; Pal, Pratapaditya. Indian Painting. Vol. 1, 1000–1700. A Catalogue of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art Collection.Los Angeles, 1993, nos. 83 a-b; Pal, Pratapaditya. Divine Images, Human Visions: The Max Tanenbaum Collection of South Asian and Himalayan Art in the National Gallery of Canada. Ottowa, 1997, no. 38; Goswamy, B[rijindra] N[ath], with Usha Bhatia. Painted Visions: The Goenka Collection of Indian Paintings. New Delhi, 1999, pp. 46–47, no. 36 and front cover ill.; Seyller, John. Workshop and Patron in Mughal India: The Freer Ramayana and Other Illustrated Manuscripts of ‘Abd al-Rahim. Artibus Asiae Supplementum, 42. Zurich, 1999, figs. 12–13; Intimate Worlds: Indian Paintings from the Alvin O. Bellak Collection. Exhibition, Philadelphia Museum of Art. Catalogue by Darielle Mason and others. Philadelphia, 2001, no. 16; L’India dei Rajput: Miniature dalla Collezione Ducrot. Exhibition, Museo d’Arte Orientale,Turin. Catalogue by Claudia Ramasso and others. Milan, 2010, p. 156, no. 142.
2. John Seyller 2001, no. 16, (reference in note 1 above) discusses this series and speculates on artists.
3. Seyller, ibid., points this out.
The Death of King Dasharatha
King Dasharata emerges in the Ramayana as essentially a noble character, though flawed by the weakness which allowed him to be swayed by his second wife Kaikeyi, whose ambitions for her own son caused the king to banish the crown prince Rama for fourteen years. Having succumbed to this pressure, Dasharata took to his sickbed, plagued by regrets, where essentially he died of grief.[1] This folio shows the passing away of the king, draped with a simple white shroud and surrounded by his queens Kaushalya, Sumitra, and Kaikeyi, and female attendants. The women's grief is conveyed by their loose, disheveled hair and by the raising of their hands to the cheek in gestures of sorrow and disbelief. The damaged left side of the composition shows part of the folded legs and upper body of a male figure, possibly a priest. The intimacy of the scene and the focus of the figures around the delicately painted face of the king imbue the painting with a marked intensity of feeling.
The areas of dense patterning for which the Ramayana series is notable are seen here in the multiple panels all around the figures, and even the decorated textiles worn by the women. This patterning recalls folios from a much larger, imperial level manuscript of about thirty years earlier, the Hanzanama, which although different in scale and medium, also has striking passages of repeating designs as in this example.[2] The bold clouds in the gold sky above appear in other pages from the series.
Navina Haidar in [Topsfield 2004]
Footnotes:
1. Shastri tr., H. P., The Ramayana of Valmiki. London 1959, vol. 1, p. 318.
2. Seyller, J., The Adventures of Hamza, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 207–7, no. 67, for similar designs on architecture.
Datia Royal Collection, India; Private collection, Calcutta (from 1947); Private collection, Europe; [ Terence McInerney, New York, until 2002; sold to MMA]
New York. Asia Society. "In the Realm of Gods and Kings: Arts of India, Selections from the Polsky Collections and The Metropolitan Museum of Art," September 14, 2004–January 2, 2005, no. 162.
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "The Ramayana," July 6–October 9, 2005.
New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "Epic India: Scenes from the Ramayana," March 30–September 19, 2010.
New York,. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. "Sita and Rama: The Ramayana in Indian Painting," August 3, 2019–March 7, 2021.
Topsfield, Andrew, ed. "Arts of India." In In the Realm of Gods and Kings. London; New York: Philip Wilson Publishers, 2004. no. 162, pp. 354–55, 366–67, ill. pp. 355, 366.
Ekhtiar, Maryam, Priscilla P. Soucek, Sheila R. Canby, and Navina Haidar, ed. Masterpieces from the Department of Islamic Art in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 1st ed. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2011. no. 249B, pp. 339, 356–57, ill. p. 357 (color).
The Met's Libraries and Research Centers provide unparalleled resources for research and welcome an international community of students and scholars.
The Met Collection API is where all makers, creators, researchers, and dreamers can connect to the most up-to-date data and public domain images for The Met collection. Open Access data and public domain images are available for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use without permission or fee.
Feedback
We continue to research and examine historical and cultural context for objects in The Met collection. If you have comments or questions about this object record, please complete and submit this form. The Museum looks forward to receiving your comments.
The Met's collection of Islamic art is one of the most comprehensive in the world and ranges in date from the seventh to the twenty-first century. Its more than 15,000 objects reflect the great diversity and range of the cultural traditions from Spain to Indonesia.